|
May 31: Yesterday, Endwar hit me with several responses to blog entries of mine, for which I'm grateful. One was to:
I like the effect of "were that/ the/ case," but think maybe the following would be better:
Endwar went on to say of it, "Anyway, it sounds like the function of the not-a-poem as you call it is to fill a blog entry. On the other hand, this reminds me of Mark Strand's 'Keeping Things Whole' without the personal involvement of the narrator (the 'I' in Strand's poem)." I don't know Strand's poem. I do intend my not-a-poem to state a philosophical position, one I consider not profound but a valid final answer to those asking why this universe exists rather than no universe. A more succinct answer would be, "because." With the note that no etiological explanation of anything is possible without an axiom that has to be accepted.
With that, I quit for the day, which I plan to use to recover from my recent personal health drama. I'm feeling pretty good, by the way. My blood pressure has been very low--except just after I got up, when it was a shade high, though nothing like yesterday's early readings. I had the second of my fish oil capsules, and went out and ran a sizzling 8-minute mile. I'm going to return to regularly jogging, but try to run very slowly--as opposed to my top rate of slow--to avoid the strained ligaments, muscle pulls and the like I seem always to experience.
|
|
e.mail me HERE |